Michael p diraimondo reviews purple
•
Latest Articles
Suitcase Report Canada
10.26502/acmcr.96550693
Safety dead weight COVID-19 Vaccines and description Effect reproach COVID-19 Pockmark in Descendants with Exploit Allergies
Published On: 2024-11-07 Authors: Junghyun Kwon, Empress K. Zhu, Pasquale Slipper, Bruce Mazer, Christine McCusker, Liane Beaudette, Duncan Lejtenyi, Danbing Impoverished, Manel Ouamrane, Moshe Ben-Shoshan
Case Slaughter Morocco
10.26502/acmcr.96550675
An Unusual Metastatic Site medium a Outgrowth Thyroid Carcinoma: A Circumstance Report
Published On: 2024-06-26 Authors: Maryam Cheddadi, Samia Sassi, Ismail Boujida, Omar Ibelkouchene, Sabrine Derqaoui, Siham Mesmoudi, Ahmed Jahid, Fouad Zouaidia, Zakia Bernoussi, Kaoutar Znati
•
Transcriptomic analysis of intestine following administration of a transglutaminase 2 inhibitor to prevent gluten-induced intestinal damage in celiac disease
Main
Gluten-containing cereals are essential foods worldwide. However, in up to 2% of individuals1, the ingestion of dietary gluten results in an abnormal immune response in the small intestine and the development of celiac disease (CeD). Predisposing genotypes (human leukocyte antigen (HLA), for example, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8) are necessary but not sufficient for the manifestation of CeD. Diarrhea, weight loss and malnutrition are classical bowel-related symptoms and signs of CeD, but anemia, osteoporosis and other autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes, are also frequent manifestations2,3,4.
Currently, a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only accepted treatment option for individuals with CeD. However, the life-long strict and restrictive GFD is onerous and difficult to follow, and inadvertent gluten ingestion is common5,6, resulting in ongoing symptoms in nearly 50% of treated individuals7,8. Keeping the GFD also has a big impact on quality of life9. Inadvertent gluten ingestion often leads to ongoing duodenal mucosal injury, with inflammation and morphological changes10. Thus, even individuals on
•
Abstract
Background: Hydrophilic dental implants are gaining increasing interest for their ability to accelerate bone formation. However, commercially available hydrophilic implants, such as SLActive™, have some major limitations due to their time-dependent biological aging and lower cost-effectiveness. The non-thermal atmospheric plasma (NTAP) treatment is a reliable way to gain a hydrophilic surface and enhance osseointegration. However, a few studies have been carried out to compare the osseointegration of NTAP-functionalized titanium implants and commercially available hydrophilic implants.
Purpose: In this study, we compare the osseointegration abilities of the NTAP-functionalized titanium implant and Straumann SLActive.
Material and methods: The NTAP effectiveness was examined using in vitro cell experiments. Then, six beagle dogs were included in the in vivo experiment. Straumann SLActive implants, SLA implants, and SLA implants treated with NTAP were implanted in the mandibular premolar area of dogs. After 2 w, 4 w, and 8 w, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were collected. Radiographic and histological analyses were used to measure osseointegration.
Results: NTAP treatment accelerated the initial attachment and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells